American Association of University Professors
On Wednesday, the Ohio General Assembly passed House Bill 96, the state operating budget bill for Fiscal Years 2026-27. Gov. DeWine has until July 1 to sign the bill. He can veto line items. Here are some of the key provisions in the bill for higher education as it came out of conference committee:
We are working with our partners at the Ohio Federation of Teachers (OFT) on a joint letter to Gov. DeWine that will outline our line-item veto requests. OCAAUP is asking for the elimination of: 1) the anti-shared governance language; 2) the “civics centers” directors’ board; 3) the civics centers directors’ control over general education course approval; and 4) the outrageous changes to the STRS Board.
HB 96 is rightfully being called one of the worst budgets in Ohio history. Although state budgets tend to earn bipartisan support, for the first time in 20 years, the budget bill didn’t garner a single Democratic vote. It is a sign of the hyper-partisan nature and lack of accountability from a gerrymandered legislature.
At a time when public schools desperately need resources, libraries are struggling, and homeowners are being hit with property tax increases, this budget gives a $600 million handout to billionaires for a new football stadium, takes huge steps backwards on adequately funding public services, and fails to solve pressing issues for Ohioans.
We must continue to push our elected officials to do better, and we need to develop strategies for how we can help to shift the tide in the 2026 elections. In the meantime, if you’d like to contact the governor with a personalized message to help push for our line-item vetoes, you can use the form here. Here is a sample message:
Gov. DeWine:
I am requesting that you veto budget items BORCD106, BORCD107, and BORCD121 from the higher education portions of HB 96. We must allow the experts to maintain real input into the most basic matters of our colleges and universities. These provisions require short-sighted and unworkable governance requirements for our public institutions and the newly formed civics centers, exacerbating administrative bloat and wasteful spending.
In addition, you must veto budget item PENCD9, which is an unacceptable attack on the STRS Board without any opportunity for public input. Shoving such a significant change to the structure of the board that serves our retired educators into a massive budget bill at the 11th hour is simply bad policy and bad politics. Any changes to the STRS system should be introduced in a standalone bill and undergo full public participation.
Thank you for your consideration.