THE RUMORS

Recently, Columbus’ local NBC affiliate reported that Ohio State University trustees are considering making former Ohio Gov. John Kasich the next university president in the wake of current President Michael V. Drake’s announced retirement.

But rumors have swirled around for much longer that Kasich would want the job if his U.S. presidential aspirations fizzled. Some speculated that the trustees named Drake president to warm the seat for Kasich, knowing that Drake wouldn’t serve for long.

BACK-SCRATCHING

Just like with Miami University, which paid Kasich $40,000 for a speech last month, Kasich appointed most of the Ohio State trustees. More than half of the voting (non-student) trustees gave political contributions to Kasich prior to their appointments:

Gary R. Heminger, Chair: $2,700
Timothy P. Smucker, Vice Chair: $2,700
Cheryl L. Krueger: $2,000
Erin P. Hoeflinger: $2,700
Alan A. Stockmeister: $2,700
John W. Zeiger: $1,000
Elizabeth P. Kessler: $2,700
Jeff M.S. Kaplan: $2,700 (plus $3,900 during his congressional career)

First campaign contributions for Kasich. Then Board seats for his contributors. Next the OSU presidency for Kasich? This type of nepotistic circle is corrupt and inappropriate in the public sector.

Besides the appearance of impropriety, there are many reasons OSU trustees should not appoint John Kasich as the 16th president of their institution.

GOV. KASICH’S HIGHER ED RECORD

As governor, Kasich was no friend to public higher education. Let’s review.

Kasich’s 1st Budget – 2011
In his first biennial budget in 2011, Kasich slashed the main funding source to colleges and universities (State Share of Instruction or SSI) by 12%.

In that same budget, the governor attempted to undermine the whole concept of public universities by proposing a “charter university” system. The idea was that, in exchange for less state funding, universities would be “freed” from many state regulations (such as tuition caps, construction requirements, public records laws).

Fortunately, the legislature cut this proposal from the final budget. However, the compromise was to allow universities to lease “auxiliary services,” such as parking and residence halls, to private companies.

Ohio State has taken advantage of this by leasing its parking system in 2013 for a 50-year period in exchange for a one-time $483 million payment. Similarly, the university leased its energy facilities in 2017 for 50 years for an upfront payment of $1 billion.

While these seemingly lucrative deals are undoubtedly tempting for universities which have been left behind by the state, essentially selling off public assets for one-time payments is short-sighted and an unsustainable budgeting model.

Moreover, Kasich was openly hostile toward faculty in his inaugural budget. During his initial gubernatorial campaign, he said he would make professors work harder. This was ironic, given that Kasich had just come off of a very lucrative deal to appear in an OSU classroom for $4,000 an appearance. He was paid $50,000 a year for no more than four visits to the classroom per term. After milking the system for so much money for doing so little, it is hard to understand how he could possibly criticize full-time faculty.

Nevertheless, Kasich’s executive budget included a provision that faculty would have to teach one additional course every other year (with no end date or other specificity). Perhaps he thought that every professor earned $50,000 for giving four lectures a term.

Yes, while sending a message with charter universities that universities were too burdened with regulation, Kasich wanted to micromanage faculty workload. The legislature ultimately abandoned this idea, too.

Kasich’s 2nd Budget – 2013
In his second biennial budget, Kasich couldn’t help himself but to introduce yet another workload mandate for faculty. This time, he was sure to include greater specificity. All research and instructional faculty would have had to teach one additional course from the previous academic year. The language, however, was permissive — boards of trustees could choose to adopt this or not. Nevertheless, legislators decided to eliminate it from the final bill.

In addition, it was this budget that Kasich introduced a new funding model for higher education, one that moves away from enrollment to one based primarily on course completions and graduations. We warned the legislature of the perils of moving from an opportunity-based system (enrollment) to a production-based system (course completions and graduations). Legislators did not heed our warnings, and our predictions have come to fruition.

As a result of the new funding model, institutions that have selective admissions, and thus more students that perform well, are being even more rewarded with SSI dollars. Conversely, this has hurt open-access institutions, and has incentivized them to become more selective with admissions.

Moreover, Kasich pushed for a vast expansion of Post-Secondary Enrollment Options (PSEO) by introducing “College Credit Plus” (CCP). It used to be the case under PSEO that high-achieving high school students could earn college credit by attending classes at their local college or university. But under CCP, even 7th graders can take “college” courses, most of which are taught in the high school. Rather than properly fund higher education, Kasich’s idea with CCP was that students and the state can save money by pushing students through their education as quickly as possible.

But, as usual, he ignored the unintended consequences. The lower division classes that are now the core of CCP have been the bread and butter of colleges and universities, which have suffered financial harm by CCP usurping these courses.

Of course, the irony was probably lost on Kasich and Republican legislators that they want public high schools to teach college courses, even though they contend the same schools are inadequate as a justification for “school choice”/support for charter schools.

Kasich’s 3rd Budget – 2015
A big piece of the governor’s third budget was pushing “competency-based education” (CBE). The idea behind CBE is that one can take a test to prove that they know material rather than having to take courses they might not otherwise need. CBE has been used for many years in fields where it is easy to ascertain competency, and we have no problem with that.

However, Kasich welcomed with open arms Western Governors University – – a “university” without any faculty — to lead the charge of CBE in Ohio.

Kasich’s 4th and Final Budget – 2017
In his final budget, the governor successfully pushed through a provision to formally recognize Western Governors University as an Ohio institution. With Ohio public colleges and universities competing for students and resources, giving a formal stamp of approval to a “university” with a dubious record of student success (when compared to similar programs at other institutions) was baffling.

Kasich’s budget also would have required public institutions of higher education to pay for students’ textbooks, allowing the institutions to charge students only up to $300 to defray those costs. With what resources, governor? That unfunded mandate was cut from the bill.

The funding that Kasich proposed for SSI in his final budget was still slightly lower than the SSI funding in actual dollars in Gov. Strickland’s final budget. Of course, when accounting for inflation, the Kasich’s funding for higher ed looks even worse. Ohio’s percentage change in per pupil spending from 2008 to 2016 was -15.2%.

Throughout his tenure as governor, Kasich successfully pushed several income tax reductions that overwhelmingly favored the wealthiest Ohioans. All the while, public goods and services, including higher education, unnecessarily suffered.

KASICH’S RECORD ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Kasich’s first major act as governor was working with State Senator Shannon Jones (R-Springboro) to introduce the infamous Senate Bill 5. SB 5 would have stripped public employees of any meaningful collective bargaining rights. Management would be able to impose contracts, and employees couldn’t strike. Despite the public outcry and opposition, the legislature passed the bill. In November 2011, the people of Ohio overwhelmingly voted to repeal SB 5 in a referendum vote.

But that didn’t stop Kasich from finding other ways to hurt public employees. Working with Republicans in the General Assembly, in 2013, the governor strong-armed the public employee retirement systems to adopt new requirements that would force systems to cut benefits and raise age and service requirements.

For example, with the State Teachers Retirement System (STRS), to which most of our members belong, active educators had their contributions raised from 10% to 14%, their final average salary figured using the last five years instead of the last three years of their careers, the service requirement increased to 35 years, as well as changes to the benefit formula and cost of living adjustment (COLA).

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY CAN DO BETTER

Despite the fact that Kasich has built a national reputation for himself through his 2016 presidential campaign as a civil candidate (who isn’t civil compared to Donald Trump?), Kasich’s time in Ohio was marked by abrasive remarks, attacks on public employees, and a dismal K-12 and higher education record (we haven’t even touched his scandalous record regarding K-12 charter schools, which garnered national scrutiny).

Someone who has exhibited a lack of support for public higher education, hostility toward faculty, and fundamental misunderstandings about academia should not be made the leader of Ohio’s flagship institution. We urge Ohio State to have an open and robust search for their next president.

Students at the University of Cincinnati are fed up with their administration spending too much money on endeavors peripheral to the academic mission, and have launched a new website airing their grievances.

At BoldyBankrupt.com, a play on the university’s slogan “Boldly Bearcat,” these student activists lay out a convincing case about the institution’s misplaced priorities and the detrimental effects to students and faculty.

The students’ goal in highlighting information on athletic deficits, administrative bloat, and the decline in tenure/tenure-track faculty, is to make the administration more transparent and accountable.

We applaud these students for raising awareness of these issues and demanding better. We hope more students begin to take a stand to defend their education, as too many of our other colleges and universities in Ohio have similar upside-down priorities.

Visit the website for more information: BoldlyBankrupt.com.

As we reported previously, Wittenberg University has announced plans to eliminate eight full-time faculty positions, including two tenure-track positions.

Ohio Conference President John McNay wrote about the backwards priorities of the Wittenberg board and administration in an op-ed piece that was published by the Springfield News Sun.

Read the op-ed here.

Ohio universities have felt the financial squeeze in recent years. Despite modest increases in recent state budgets, State Share of Instruction (SSI) has not recovered from decades of decline and neglect. Some campuses also have faced enrollment challenges, as competition among institutions has increased and students are increasingly reluctant to take on student debt.

As a result of these financial woes, Ohio universities have done a number of things to save money: hire adjuncts instead of full-time faculty; reorganize or eliminate academic departments; offer buyouts to faculty; and other measures that target the academic sides of the institutions.

Meanwhile, universities continue to spend vast sums subsidizing their athletic programs. Most students and taxpayers have no idea that every university in Ohio, save Ohio State, takes heavily from the academic side of the institution to off-set the millions in spending on athletics that are not covered by ticket sales, sponsorships, and other revenues actually generated by athletics.

The graph below illustrates the percentage and dollar amount that each Ohio university subsidized their athletic program for the 2017-18 academic year.

Ohio faculty support student-athletes and appreciate the community that sports can build on a campus. But when universities are pressed with tough financial decisions, can they continue to justify robbing the academic mission — the reason our institutions exist — to subsidize athletics?

Here are some common myths about college athletics:

Myth 1: University athletics are self-sustaining or make money for their institutions.
Fact: There are only a handful of universities nationwide (including Ohio State) that have self-sustaining or revenue-generating sports. At all other institutions, athletics are paid for by a mixture of student fees, tuition dollars, and taxpayer-funded state subsidy.

Myth 2: Athletics draws students to universities.
Fact: Surveys have shown that athletics has little to nothing to do with students choosing schools that are not the big college football powerhouses.

Myth 3: Athletics serves as advertising for universities.
Fact: Research has shown that universities would be better off using the money to fund an actual advertising campaign than using the money for athletics.

Myth 4: Most of athletic spending supports student-athlete scholarships and all student-athletes get a “free ride.”
Fact: At Division 1 schools, less than 17% of athletic budgets are spent on student scholarships. Most of the athletic budget is spent on coaches’ salaries and facilities. Very few student-athletes get full-tuition scholarships.

The Ohio Conference AAUP’s Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure will investigate the planned terminations of eight (8) Wittenberg University full-time professors that were announced in September. Six of the faculty are non-tenure-eligible, while two of the faculty are tenure-track.

The proposed cuts come shortly after the announcement of the official opening of a controversial $54 million athletic facility.

The Ohio Conference AAUP Committee A investigates matters of academic freedom, promotion, tenure, reappointment and other academic issues to determine if an institution has followed — or violated — long-standing AAUP guidelines and principles.

Wittenberg administrators reportedly made the decision to eliminate the eight faculty positions as part of a “plan to reevaluate staffing levels and programmatic offerings at Wittenberg in light of current and projected enrollment numbers and changing student demographics across the state and country,” according to a Dayton Daily News article.

While only the faculty terminations have been announced to date, it is expected that program eliminations are forthcoming. Proposals for program discontinuation, which would result in further faculty losses, including tenured faculty, have been forwarded to the faculty Educational Policies Committee for discussion.

Conference President John McNay began the Committee A inquiry with a visit to the Wittenberg campus, where he met with a large group of faculty who are reigniting their AAUP chapter. His visit revealed several potential violations of AAUP guidelines, which have been passed along to Committee A Chair John Blackburn, who will continue the investigation.